When I used WM5, it gave me a very very bad experience, no matter the speed or the stability. Also I could not see any "big"(my opinion only) improvement in WM6 and it really an old OS, so I won't consider WM smartphone. Old OS may not bad, Palm OS is a really good and stable OS. But, improvement is really necessary, that's why palm also discard its old OS and develop webOS. Microsoft always wait for "copy" from other products, no innovation. Therefore I am not interested in MW smartphone.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
smskkc @ Jul 13th 2009 10:10PM
Windows mobile.....old OS, how can wm compare to android, Palm Pre webOS and even MacOS X?
breit818 @ Jul 14th 2009 5:33AM
WM還是功能最強大的啊 !(會用的話...) android, Plam webOS 等還要等等吧! (發展空間很大!!!)
(新等於好????)
不過 Toshiba 在 WM 上好像倒沒攪出一台好戲倒是真的!(bug 一大堆!)
breit818 @ Jul 15th 2009 12:02PM
WM還是功能最強大的啊 !(會用的話...) android, Plam webOS 等還要等等吧(發展空間很大!) ! (新等於好?)
不過 Toshiba 在 WM 上好像倒沒攪出一台好戲倒是真的!(bug 一大堆!)
breit818 @ Jul 14th 2009 2:37PM
WM還是功能最強大的啊 !(會用的話...) android, Plam webOS 等還要等等吧(發展空間很大!) ! (新等於好?)
不過 Toshiba 在 WM 上好像倒沒攪出一台好戲倒是真的!(bug 一大堆!)
smskkc @ Jul 15th 2009 11:02PM
When I used WM5, it gave me a very very bad experience, no matter the speed or the stability. Also I could not see any "big"(my opinion only) improvement in WM6 and it really an old OS, so I won't consider WM smartphone.
Old OS may not bad, Palm OS is a really good and stable OS. But, improvement is really necessary, that's why palm also discard its old OS and develop webOS. Microsoft always wait for "copy" from other products, no innovation. Therefore I am not interested in MW smartphone.