Skip to Content
現在這種netbook真的太多了...有沒有廠商能打破使用長效電池就得忍受重一點或是凸屁股的限制呢？
如果可以長效但不要重一點，那同樣情況下，非長效當然又能輕一點。那減重後的長效電池還是重了一點。所以這是比較性問題，不是絕對性問題。至於不要突出來，那就積體變大，但是變成非長效時凹進去。
沒問題阿～預算準備個80000，就可以辦到了
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Gagne @ Jul 1st 2009 3:01PM
現在這種netbook真的太多了...
有沒有廠商能打破使用長效電池就得忍受重一點或是凸屁股的限制呢？
Ovaltine @ Jul 1st 2009 3:25PM
如果可以長效但不要重一點，
那同樣情況下，非長效當然又能輕一點。
那減重後的長效電池還是重了一點。
所以這是比較性問題，不是絕對性問題。
至於不要突出來，那就積體變大，但是變成非長效時凹進去。
lastjocker @ Jul 1st 2009 11:37PM
沒問題阿～
預算準備個80000，就可以辦到了