http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for Orbo 故事的最後一章（？）：再見，Orbo http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/Jun 24th 2009 12:16AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/Jun 24th 2009 8:02AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/Jun 25th 2009 9:00AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/
先不管到底永動機是不是有實做出來的"可能性"，
問題是這麼重大到可以撼動整個物理學界的事情

怎麼可能連一篇先行的學術研究跟論文都沒有發表?

好，即使我們假設這家公司裡面出了個有如愛老般天才的傢伙
問題是人類所擁有的知識是累積性的，更何況近代知識的流通與共享更是愛老那個時代無法想像的。如果今天累積的知識已經足夠研究出某種突破性的概念或是產品
(像是電燈，相對論等等)
這家公司的某人可以，同樣的，一定也有人發展出近似的突破了
這種事情在過去歷史上比比皆是
常常有人發表了一份論文之後，才發現一年前其實另外一個人就有提出過類似的概念

但是目前物理學界在這個議題上是一片靜悄悄

所以要我相信這家公司真的做出永動機了?
拍謝，除非他們能證明有個人受到"天啟"了或者是接收到未來的訊息了]]>Jun 24th 2009 5:51AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/Jun 24th 2009 8:48PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/原来不是只有国人才玩高科技噌饭活，老外也来这套。永动机是个不错的接口，两年里Steorn 不停的融资不停申贷不停叫国家扶持，够钱买买别墅开开名跑了。]]>Jun 24th 2009 10:12AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/24/orbo-saga-ends-but-goes-on/Jun 25th 2009 8:24AM