Skip to Content
首先謝謝編輯，這樣看就非常清楚ISO以小DC的標準來看很棒，但跟目前NCS三大廠商的同價位低階DSLR比就不行了。如果是100％觀看我只能接受ISO400...或許還要更低才行，但縮圖之後我可以接受ISO800～1600。抹雜訊後的樣子是偽色少/噪點多，這點也很討喜。因為環境太亮，沒辦法測出暗處的合焦性能。以這段影片來看鏡頭應該沒有很嚴重的拉風箱（目前4/3的鏡頭大多有支援對比對焦了），但合焦前還是RUN了兩輪，考慮到機身等級算是一般表現吧
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
seisyuku @ Jun 19th 2009 11:12AM
首先謝謝編輯，這樣看就非常清楚
ISO以小DC的標準來看很棒，但跟目前NCS三大廠商的同價位低階DSLR比就不行了。如果是100％觀看我只能接受ISO400...或許還要更低才行，但縮圖之後我可以接受ISO800～1600。抹雜訊後的樣子是偽色少/噪點多，這點也很討喜。
因為環境太亮，沒辦法測出暗處的合焦性能。以這段影片來看鏡頭應該沒有很嚴重的拉風箱（目前4/3的鏡頭大多有支援對比對焦了），但合焦前還是RUN了兩輪，考慮到機身等級算是一般表現吧