http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for 小薑雜談：Olympus E-P1 與 Micro Four Thirds 系統（下） http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
另外，我覺得這台的定位應該接近於 "打死低階數位單眼"（買低階數位單眼當作練習機者例外）

可是價錢卻直逼中階數位單眼 是比較令人失望的一點]]>Jun 18th 2009 12:16AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/之後會不會出全黑機身？]]>Jun 18th 2009 12:29AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/及操作反應, 畢境會買這種機子都是玩家了,
操作感可能是一個很重要的入手因素]]>Jun 18th 2009 1:28AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
有14mm or 12mm這種廣定焦嗎?

這樣我就可以換掉GRDII了]]>Jun 18th 2009 1:56AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/E-P1按下快門後,那個"卡擦"是喇叭發出?還是真正的機械快門聲??]]>Jun 18th 2009 2:04AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
我們明天會去實際看看 E-P1 是電子式的快門還是機械式的快門…]]>Jun 18th 2009 2:20AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
在試玩現場沒有特別注意聲音來自那裏，我想要明天 Andy 特別去留意才有真正答案。]]>Jun 18th 2009 2:49AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 7:50AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 10:29AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
像G-1 那種機械快門的話是平時開着, 到拍的時候再做一次開關。]]>Jun 18th 2009 10:45AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
我對m4/3的耗電量跟對比對焦能否達到E-P1宣稱的程度實在是頗好奇]]>Jun 18th 2009 2:19AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/又要一定的電源去推鏡頭的馬達，天生上就注定耗電量會比一般DC大
]]>Jun 18th 2009 10:13PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/
能不能轉接、有沒有出黑色這種事情，各位，估狗就有答案了啊～]]>Jun 18th 2009 2:32AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 4:52AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 5:24AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/可以拍16:9的照片嗎?]]>Jun 18th 2009 7:53AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 10:00AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/Jun 18th 2009 11:25AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-2/測光系統才是在機頂。
對於DSLR的使用者而言，看的應該是EP1的鏡群是否小巧完整，
但目前只有一顆17mm堪稱小巧。
對消費機的使用者而言，EP1是否太貴了？！
大家難免會拿EP1和Canon G10, Panasonic LX3, Richo GX200來比，
EP1的好真的能讓一般DC使用者感受得到？
另外，G1做成DSLR會大賣，主要市場就是在不會買DSLR的族群，
卻想擁有類似DSLR的功能及外觀（看起來比較專業？？？）
所以這是敗筆抑或是聰明的選擇？銷售成績會說話！
反而是EP1不上不下，很容易搞得叫好不叫座~~~~
]]>Jun 18th 2009 10:35PM