http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for Intel 在準備六核心 Nehalem 處理器？ http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/Jun 13th 2009 4:03AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/Jun 13th 2009 4:20AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/
硬體再強，軟體不支援一點鳥用都沒有阿！
別說應用程式了，連遊戲都不支援多核。
市面上一堆誇稱遊戲專用機的多核主機，都是拐人騙錢的！]]>Jun 13th 2009 4:30AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/
不過話說回來，AMD的六核心處理器也要推出了，看來又有有趣的競爭了。]]>Jun 13th 2009 6:36AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/就像現在 nVIDIA 顯示卡動輒幾百個 Stream Processor 一樣，在多媒體領域是用得到的。]]>Jun 13th 2009 7:06AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/Jun 13th 2009 4:58AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/]]>Jun 13th 2009 5:45AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/Jun 14th 2009 8:32AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/看來應該是4+2了]]>Jun 13th 2009 11:57AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/何必存勒
挑顆夠用的就好...]]>Jun 14th 2009 12:17AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/
但一般通用的程式是連續性的，資料與資料間的關連性很緊密，不適合多執行續處理
換句話說，多執行續根本上就違背了人腦的思考模式(試想：你可以同時計算兩個2位數以上的乘法及除法，並同時寫出來嗎?)，造成程式撰寫時很難往這方向來走(程式設計師也是人)，也因此常忽略了多工處理的優勢

現在能做的也只是把關連性較低或零關連性的資料拆開到各個核心來處理，變的所有的核心不能平均分擔所有的資料
造成一般通用應用時，也很難有顯著的加速(有快？到底快多少，其實也只是硬體玩家拿Benchmark或碼表比數字自嗨，其實真的感覺起來沒差這麼多)]]>Jun 13th 2009 3:47PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/一切也只是淪為廠商獲取絕大利潤的賣點而已]]>Jun 13th 2009 9:54PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/13/six-core-intel-nehalem-processors-in-the-works/Jun 15th 2009 2:54AM