Skip to Content
應該不會超過台幣3000元才是，最多3千5真怪的邏輯...
「但應該不會超過台幣3000元才是，最多3千5」設價錢為x，第一句話是說x < 3000，第二句話表示x < 3500，所以從這兩句可推論出 x < 3500由此可知第一句為廢話。
還好啊意思是說應該不會超過三千 但是既然說 "應該", 就表示還是有不幸超過的可能 畢竟天有不測風雲 人有旦夕禍福 吃芝麻哪有不掉燒餅（？）的而最多三千五，就是癮科科掛保證的，絕對，絕對不會超過。沒有 "大概"，沒有 "意外"，要是買超過三千五，找癮科科退錢也可以
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
阿達 @ May 19th 2009 9:21PM
應該不會超過台幣3000元才是，最多3千5
真怪的邏輯...
Ben @ May 20th 2009 6:23AM
「但應該不會超過台幣3000元才是，最多3千5」
設價錢為x，第一句話是說x < 3000，第二句話表示x < 3500，所以從這兩句可推論出 x < 3500
由此可知第一句為廢話。
六百 @ May 20th 2009 10:50AM
還好啊
意思是說應該不會超過三千
但是既然說 "應該", 就表示還是有不幸超過的可能 畢竟天有不測風雲 人有旦夕禍福 吃芝麻哪有不掉燒餅（？）的
而最多三千五，就是癮科科掛保證的，絕對，絕對不會超過。沒有 "大概"，沒有 "意外"，要是買超過三千五，找癮科科退錢也可以