Skip to Content
不知道這是怎麼算的，不過OCZ SSD耗電 2W operation, .5W standby，Seagate Montntus 耗電 1.54W seek, read/write 2.65/2.85, idle/standby 0.81/0.22seagate 看起來比較耗電。但是硬碟容量OCZ SSD 60gb,120gb. Seagate 120GB/250Gb/500GB。如果真要比耗電的用一個seagate需要用到兩個OCZ SSD，這樣是誰比較耗電？或者有人會說，用2.5吋得來比不公平，效能差太多。那不然拿Barracuda 7200來比好了，idel/seek 2.6/2.75，耗電有再多一點點，但是容量可是可以到1TB.OCZ SSD Specification: http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/flash_drives/ocz_vertex_ex_series_sata_ii_2_5-ssdSeagate Speificationhttp://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/zh-TW/datasheet/disc/ds_momentus_5400_6.pdfhttp://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_barracuda_7200_12.pdf
說的有理！！！SSD在規模經濟上還不到要去用他的程度。說現在就要換的應該是業代話術
你應該拿 15,000 RPM 的 SAS 硬碟來比, 因為上面說要 replace 的是這類硬碟.至於售價, 15krpm 的 SAS 一棵也要好幾萬, 不會比 SSD 便宜到哪去.
Cheetah® 15K.6最小也有145GCheetah® 15K.7最小也有300G,還有PowerTrim技術降低功耗企業要用的最少也要SLC顆粒的SSD才死的比較慢SLC容量要到145G以上........天價~!
以傳輸速率都是100MB/s左右的兩個產品來看Seagate Cheetah 15K.6 146GB 1萬多Mtron MOBI-3500 64G SLC SSD 要1萬5以上也就是說同容量價格差三倍...................
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
albert @ May 10th 2009 11:33PM
不知道這是怎麼算的，不過OCZ SSD耗電 2W operation, .5W standby，
Seagate Montntus 耗電 1.54W seek, read/write 2.65/2.85, idle/standby 0.81/0.22
seagate 看起來比較耗電。
但是硬碟容量OCZ SSD 60gb,120gb. Seagate 120GB/250Gb/500GB。
如果真要比耗電的用一個seagate需要用到兩個OCZ SSD，這樣是誰比較耗電？
或者有人會說，用2.5吋得來比不公平，效能差太多。
那不然拿Barracuda 7200來比好了，idel/seek 2.6/2.75，耗電有再多一點點，但是容量可是可以到1TB.
OCZ SSD Specification:
http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/flash_drives/ocz_vertex_ex_series_sata_ii_2_5-ssd
Seagate Speification
http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/zh-TW/datasheet/disc/ds_momentus_5400_6.pdf
http://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_barracuda_7200_12.pdf
bostus @ May 11th 2009 12:11AM
說的有理！！！
SSD在規模經濟上還不到要去用他的程度。說現在就要換的應該是業代話術
Palatis @ May 11th 2009 5:55AM
你應該拿 15,000 RPM 的 SAS 硬碟來比, 因為上面說要 replace 的是這類硬碟.
至於售價, 15krpm 的 SAS 一棵也要好幾萬, 不會比 SSD 便宜到哪去.
dxseva @ May 11th 2009 9:41AM
Cheetah® 15K.6最小也有145G
Cheetah® 15K.7最小也有300G,還有PowerTrim技術降低功耗
企業要用的最少也要SLC顆粒的SSD才死的比較慢
SLC容量要到145G以上........天價~!
dxseva @ May 11th 2009 10:04AM
以傳輸速率都是100MB/s左右的兩個產品來看
Seagate Cheetah 15K.6 146GB 1萬多
Mtron MOBI-3500 64G SLC SSD 要1萬5以上
也就是說同容量價格差三倍...................