Skip to Content
我想你的推論有問題kuo 解釋的很好。(1)IQ是常態分佈，(2)IQ中央平均值與人種/性別無關。所以印度IQ最高的前 25% 的人數，比全美國的總人口還高意思就是說印度較聰明的人口比全美人口還多。但是你加的這句 "印度最有錢的前 25% 的人數，也比全美國的總人口還高", 這種說法當然正確，可是沒有意義。因為印度最有錢的前25%的人數的"財產"，遠遠比不上美國人的財產。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
KK @ May 8th 2009 1:53PM
我想你的推論有問題
kuo 解釋的很好。
(1)IQ是常態分佈，(2)IQ中央平均值與人種/性別無關。
所以印度IQ最高的前 25% 的人數，比全美國的總人口還高
意思就是說印度較聰明的人口比全美人口還多。
但是你加的這句 "印度最有錢的前 25% 的人數，也比全美國的總人口還高", 這種說法當然正確，可是沒有意義。
因為印度最有錢的前25%的人數的"財產"，遠遠比不上美國人的財產。