Skip to Content
就事論事，商品或規格會不會成功跟開不開放授權或收不收授權金是沒有絕對關係的。您舉的Wintel陣營的例子，主要原因應該是當時的IBM開放PC標準採用x86架構以及DOS系統，才讓這兩家公司壯大的，如果當初沒有IBM，現在的MS和Intel的局面也許會不同吧。如果Intel開放標準，也不可能導致威盛當時被告侵權(可見Intel和Apple一樣，只挑對自己有益處的部分開放標準)。當然IBM這個例子還是說明開放標準是一件好事(以結局論，對IBM就不見得好XD)。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
史考特 @ Dec 3rd 2008 12:48AM
就事論事，商品或規格會不會成功跟開不開放授權或收不收授權金是沒有絕對關係的。
您舉的Wintel陣營的例子，主要原因應該是當時的IBM開放PC標準採用x86架構以及DOS系統，才讓這兩家公司壯大的，如果當初沒有IBM，現在的MS和Intel的局面也許會不同吧。如果Intel開放標準，也不可能導致威盛當時被告侵權(可見Intel和Apple一樣，只挑對自己有益處的部分開放標準)。當然IBM這個例子還是說明開放標準是一件好事(以結局論，對IBM就不見得好XD)。