Skip to Content
我得說...花在核融合上的錢...應該有接近上兆美金了 從五十年前說五十年會好 到現在說應該再五十年會好 從美俄兩國的競賽 到現在全球所有主要國家都投入數個billion美金 當然不可否認當中有些發展的發向會有政治考量 但最大的原因還是在核融合比想像中的複雜太多 尤其是目前唯一的可能的核融合電廠裝置Tokamaks更是複雜... 光是在toroidal和poloidal兩個方向上都有磁場就可以讓整個裝置出現很多奇奇怪怪的現象
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
aroy @ Oct 31st 2008 3:46AM
我得說...花在核融合上的錢...應該有接近上兆美金了
從五十年前說五十年會好 到現在說應該再五十年會好
從美俄兩國的競賽 到現在全球所有主要國家都投入數個billion美金
當然不可否認當中有些發展的發向會有政治考量
但最大的原因還是在核融合比想像中的複雜太多
尤其是目前唯一的可能的核融合電廠裝置Tokamaks更是複雜...
光是在toroidal和poloidal兩個方向上都有磁場
就可以讓整個裝置出現很多奇奇怪怪的現象