http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for 癮科學：替代能源 -- 核能 http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 12:45AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 1:18AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/
濃度夠高的氫氣去哪生? 靠氫氣發電成本也太高了吧...]]>Oct 31st 2008 1:33AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 1:36AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/
水+輸入能量->氫+氧
氫+氧->輸出能量+水

輸出能量理論上只能小於等於輸入能量，不然就可以做出永動機了。]]>Oct 31st 2008 1:48PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 1:20AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/從五十年前說五十年會好 到現在說應該再五十年會好
從美俄兩國的競賽 到現在全球所有主要國家都投入數個billion美金

當然不可否認當中有些發展的發向會有政治考量
但最大的原因還是在核融合比想像中的複雜太多
尤其是目前唯一的可能的核融合電廠裝置Tokamaks更是複雜...
光是在toroidal和poloidal兩個方向上都有磁場
就可以讓整個裝置出現很多奇奇怪怪的現象
]]>Oct 31st 2008 3:46AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 1:22AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/以及對核能技術抱持不信任的觀點的人
不管對方提出怎樣的數據與文件
都可以將之解釋為政治操作
所以這個問題.........應該是無解的]]>Oct 31st 2008 1:32AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 1:48AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 2:44AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/等我兩百年 XD]]>Oct 31st 2008 10:38AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/一樣的需求電量, 火力跟核能那個產出的廢物多吧。
而這些廢物再回收的成本再做出考量才是正確的方法。

縮小核融合發電的體積.
我也想能開核融合車阿～]]>Oct 31st 2008 1:55AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/問題是這「一堆」可是很大一堆......]]>Nov 3rd 2008 7:01AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/核能是先把核廢料的問題藏起來, 才會有相對乾淨的假象. 如果火力發電的汙染像慢性病; 核能發電的污染就像癌症, 不發則以, 一發就拜拜.
全世界研究的方向都是在防範核能輻射外洩, 但是對於核廢料還是束手無策, 就跟保麗龍一樣, 萬年不爛, 只是保麗龍比較倒楣, 被禁用, 因為它不能發電.
此外, 核電廠也是有壽命的限制, 一旦停止運作, 那個地方跟核廢料一樣, 也是禁區.
能源需求的現實是源自於[ 永遠不夠 ]的貪婪, 這也是綠色能源興起的主軸, 這樣說好了, 如果規定用電量超過某個額度時, 就要在自己的家裡提供一個地方給國家放核廢料, 大家馬上就會自己斷電, 找替代能源, 甚至不會抱怨能源不夠. ]]>Oct 31st 2008 1:59AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 2:03AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/不過可用的資源就這樣沒了，如果可以把核廢料回收應該是最好的解決方式]]>Oct 31st 2008 2:14AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/如果做的出宇宙電梯，往無盡的太空丟就好了XD]]>Oct 31st 2008 10:49PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/Oct 31st 2008 2:09AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/10/31/alternative-power-sources-nuclear/這是壓水式反應爐(PWR)的發電方式, 台灣只有核三兩部機是PWR, 核一核二跟核四都是沸水式反應爐(BWR)的設計, 直接在反應爐將水加熱送到汽機帶動發電機.]]>Oct 31st 2008 2:15AM