<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[寫的真不錯<br>增廣見聞了！<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 12:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[畫素高比較好？小薑你也有錯誤的迷思喔，高畫素的相機如果配的是個爛解析度的鏡頭，那根本比不上畫素低一點但是是高解析度鏡頭拍出來的照片。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Wang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[都已經說迷思了，他在內文根本就是在談一般人有這迷思是錯誤的，不曉得你是不是真的有看文章。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[雖然這在攝影愛好者之間人所共知的事<br>但一般人似乎大多不知道<br>就像當年INTEL不惜降低效能也要催谷時脈一樣]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doomsday specter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[乾脆以後也來個雙核心 雙鏡頭照相機 orz]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA["圖上的框框大小是真實大小的 1/10。"<br><br>這應該得先問過我的顯示器吧？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[albertpkmn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[和顯示器無關哦。<br>這邊的圖是以像素為單位的，所以1024像素縮小後就是102像素。<br>在19"螢幕和42"螢幕看，都是102像素。<br>但在42"螢幕看，實際尺寸會比較大就是了，像素還是那麼多。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aurachen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[它並不用問過你的顯示器... <br>因為例如1024的1/10, 它在畫圖的時候,畫成102 pixels長的長方形就好了<br>到你的顯示器上還是顯示成102 pixels, 也就還是1024的1/10....<br>這樣你懂嗎... 哪個顯示器上看到都是102 pixels.... 不會自動變成別的pixels.... = =]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 6:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[給樓上的Amy<br><br>需要過問顯示器的原因，是因為不同尺寸以及不同解析度的螢幕點距大小不同。<br>同樣是102 pixels 在22" 1680x1050 (0.282mm) 跟 24" 1920x1200 (0.270mm)<br>顯示同樣的圖片，其實際"面積"絕對不會是同樣大小。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Foxly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[畫素不做高一點，<br>那些便宜的要死的記憶卡要拿去賣誰呢，<br>呵呵呵~~~~~]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA["全幅的數位單眼相機感光器對角線長達 35mm"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[1/1.7"、6mp.........富士經典名機f30、f31，至今依舊天下無敵(消費機而言)<br>現在只有把希望寄託在m4/3上，希望那兩摳別再亂加畫素，<br>這樣才有體積小、抗噪又不錯的類單眼能玩]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[banbanzon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[相當中肯的意見.<br><br>像素真的是夠用就好, 光學品質的好壞才是決定最終畫質的關鍵.<br>並不是每個人都是閒著沒事在搞後製的.<br><br>F31fd 的使用者]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A-Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[後製並不能把失去的畫質找回來<br>只能騙騙大家，讓相片看起來好像比較銳利。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2008 11:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[「全幅的數位單眼相機感光器對角線長達 35mm」＜－－此句有誤。全幅（35mm）感光器的規格為24mm x 36mm（或近似），其對角線為43mm。小型DC和4/3系統標示感光器的大小為對角線（實際對角線小於其數字標示，因為它延用以前電視攝像管的標示法，是攝像管的直徑），但是FX（全幅）感光器是延用以前底片的標示，35mm是底片的寬度：24mm加上兩旁的齒格共為35mm。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[那如果拍攝時降低畫素，比如最高畫素是1400萬，但只用600萬畫素來拍，這樣畫質相對於1400萬時會提升嗎？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[royal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[不會提升<br><a href="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2007/09/19/7036.html" rel="nofollow">http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2007/09/19/7036.html</a><br>f50就算砍一半用6mp還是輸f31]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[banbanzon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 2:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[回答錯誤=.="<br>14m相機用6m拍會不會比14m好......可能高iso的話比較看的出差異吧^^"<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[banbanzon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 2:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[簡單的說<br>3年前的東西<br>跟現在的比<br>照出來的照片差不到那去喔~]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yunchii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 2:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å°èéè«ï¼ç¾è¬ç«ç´ çè¿·æ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/09/29/the-megapixel-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[不完全同意這篇說法，像素對於專業的大圖輸出還是有決定性的影響，不然26mp的機背是出心酸的嗎? (話說回來，120的片幅好大，好像也不是這樣比的 XD) ，比較精準來說，還是要看感光元件大小比畫素的密度，密度越小雜訊相較而言比較低...<br><br>不過對於消費機市場來說，畫素戰爭的確是沒什麼意義...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 3:45AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>