Skip to Content
恩～ 癮科學很讚～
沒錯～癮科學看起來真的很不錯！雖說比科學人之流的容易閱讀，但感覺起來卻跟wikipedia一樣有著不確定感＠＠
相當應同你的說法,每次來癮科技,最快樂就是看到這些詳細,而且很實在的科學,每每這些資訊都不容易在報章或雜誌看到,就算看到也沒有好好的解釋,結果看了也是沒看一樣...繼續努力,多點癮科學篇的文章喔
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BoomCAT @ Sep 26th 2008 12:05AM
恩～ 癮科學很讚～
eason @ Sep 26th 2008 12:20AM
沒錯～癮科學看起來真的很不錯！
雖說比科學人之流的容易閱讀，但感覺起來卻跟wikipedia一樣有著不確定感＠＠
Nikita @ Sep 26th 2008 12:30AM
相當應同你的說法,每次來癮科技,最快樂就是看到這些詳細,而且很實在的科學,每每這些資訊都不容易在報章或雜誌看到,就算看到也沒有好好的解釋,結果看了也是沒看一樣...繼續努力,多點癮科學篇的文章喔