<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for WiMAXæ¯å¦è½å¤ ç¨ç«çå­ï¼å¾å¨éè¶èçæ¶è¨­è«èµ·</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/15/wimax-vee/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for WiMAXæ¯å¦è½å¤ ç¨ç«çå­ï¼å¾å¨éè¶èçæ¶è¨­è«èµ·</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WiMAXæ¯å¦è½å¤ ç¨ç«çå­ï¼å¾å¨éè¶èçæ¶è¨­è«èµ·]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/15/wimax-vee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/15/wimax-vee/</guid><description><![CDATA[看了一下，真的也被午陽集團的規模嚇到，<br>還蠻難得有這麼認真的集團，<br>不過他們的介面怎麼這麼醜阿.....。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 15th 2008 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WiMAXæ¯å¦è½å¤ ç¨ç«çå­ï¼å¾å¨éè¶èçæ¶è¨­è«èµ·]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/15/wimax-vee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/15/wimax-vee/</guid><description><![CDATA[這個還好吧？幾乎每家的規劃都是這樣阿。大家都提了一堆包山包海的solution..並不會差很多。<br><br>他的優勢應該是在有線電視的backbone大概都已經改成光纖這一部份，其他各區的業者在這點上比較吃虧。<br><br>不過決勝點不在這地方。老實說現在各家都企圖弄個自己的平台來想要來包山包海。根據過去的經驗，失敗的多。<br><br>以他們的模式來看，大概是想要把有線電視變成網路化，這部分或許可以成為獲利來源，倒是值得觀察看看看。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pingtung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 15th 2008 2:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>