Skip to Content
以光學品質來說，光的路徑越短，對畫質的提升越有幫助。如果 micro 3/4 能架構出一套全新的 RF 系統，或許真的可以航向藍海也說不定。以前我有和朋友的 Leica M6 比較過，同樣一機三鏡( 28mm、50mm、85mm)， SLR 系統光是體積就比 RF 系統虛胖的太多，這對喜歡旅遊的人來說，背著單眼系統真的是比較麻煩。況且 RF 機身拿在手上的感覺也比較不那麼有攻擊性，想側拍一些人文照片也比較方便；在加上少了反光鏡的震動，對影像的穩定性也比較有幫助。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ross_tt @ Aug 5th 2008 5:52AM
以光學品質來說，光的路徑越短，對畫質的提升越有幫助。如果 micro 3/4 能架構出一套全新的 RF 系統，或許真的可以航向藍海也說不定。
以前我有和朋友的 Leica M6 比較過，同樣一機三鏡( 28mm、50mm、85mm)， SLR 系統光是體積就比 RF 系統虛胖的太多，這對喜歡旅遊的人來說，背著單眼系統真的是比較麻煩。
況且 RF 機身拿在手上的感覺也比較不那麼有攻擊性，想側拍一些人文照片也比較方便；在加上少了反光鏡的震動，對影像的穩定性也比較有幫助。