<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[O記的賭的真大～～<br><br>xD....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 7:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[已經黔驢技窮了吧<br>當初堅持死守43，現在對手都到FF了<br><br>對拿DSLR的人來說，不僅輕一點的機身吸引力不大，O家也忘記拿DSLR的人講究的是畫質，孤且不論LCD解析度可以做到多好，光是LCD在戶外那種『黑媽媽』的樣子.....能用嗎？<br><br>我是希望他們與其把腦筋動在這些有的沒有，倒不如想想如何提供更精準的白平衡、溫而不膩的發色、高可用iso......明明有很多可以搞的]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naoki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 4:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[我要買14mm的餅乾鏡頭，搭配小機身...一定超爽<br><br>最重要的是，成像品質要好跟平常的DSLR一樣啊～<br><br>不然....又一次    xD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 7:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[這其實應該會有他的市場, 而且如果賣價又夠漂亮, 說不定會成為主流. <br>傳統折射的方式雖然能讓眼睛看到實際的景物, 但是人的大腦會調整環境的色溫, 而LCD呈現的是100%的環境色溫, 人腦會調整色溫, 所以即使是黃昏, 但到樹葉還是綠色, 但是拍出來的照片就是偏黃, 初學者對此的感觸應該最深.<br>此外, 五棱鏡與反光鏡的機構也會增加振動的因素, 慢快門時, 反光鏡彈跳的瞬間, 可能就毀掉一張照片. 而且早期底片機要做這樣的設計是為了求得眼鏡看到的範圍與底片感光範圍0誤差. 現在感應器可以直接轉換影像, 如果只是為了讓眼睛看到實際景象, 做這麼複雜的機構動作, 其實不見得合理.<br>一般人感受不到鏡頭縮小的好處, 不過一旦拿超過200mm大光圈的鏡頭, 那可能就是幾百公克, 甚至幾公斤的差距. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlackHeart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 4:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[拿來做高畫質的DC（Sony R1-like）或許不錯？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PKCg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 5:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[我想小薑應該不是4/3用家吧! 如果是4/3的用家...今天都會很開心!!!<br><br>看看吧!<br><a href="http://photofan.jp/camera/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5297&forum=2&post_id=46508#forumpost46508" rel="nofollow">http://photofan.jp/camera/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5297&forum=2&post_id=46508#forumpost46508</a><br><br><a href="http://www.omuser.com/viewthread.php?tid=67277&extra=page%3D1" rel="nofollow">http://www.omuser.com/viewthread.php?tid=67277&extra=page%3D1</a><br><br><a href="http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=249&t=719344&last=7402810" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=249&t=719344&last=7402810</a><br><br>4/3細感光元的路是這樣走才有出路的...和其它大廠比像素根本輸了!!!<br><br>想想從前RF相機吧!!!<br><br><br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 5:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[以光學品質來說，光的路徑越短，對畫質的提升越有幫助。如果 micro 3/4 能架構出一套全新的 RF 系統，或許真的可以航向藍海也說不定。<br><br>以前我有和朋友的 Leica M6 比較過，同樣一機三鏡( 28mm、50mm、85mm)， SLR 系統光是體積就比 RF 系統虛胖的太多，這對喜歡旅遊的人來說，背著單眼系統真的是比較麻煩。<br><br>況且 RF 機身拿在手上的感覺也比較不那麼有攻擊性，想側拍一些人文照片也比較方便；在加上少了反光鏡的震動，對影像的穩定性也比較有幫助。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ross_tt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 5:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[反光鏡及五棱鏡當然是可以省略的元件，消費機與ＤＳＬＲ之間的<br>差距太大，介於兩者之間的產品我相信是有其市場的．]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, ChihCheng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 5:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[我覺得很棒啊~<br><br>類DC的體積加上DSLR的畫質, 不管用在DSLR或在DC上也很有看頭啊!<br><br>數位化就是越做越小才是皇道.<br><br>不是拿大砲才會拍照, 好嗎?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[francis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 9:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[4/3系統現在真的完全朝小型化的極限邁進了，比消費機要好的畫質加上輕便小巧，不論是高階dc的市場，或是已有DSLR想買隨身機的人，因該都很有吸引力吧。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kouko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 7:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[接環口徑跟 Leica m-mount 一樣，flange 又比 M/M39要短，看來有野心啊～]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[leafy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 7:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[我也很贊成BlackHeart兄講的<br>如果ccd都可以直接感應了.為何還要堅持作反光鏡<br>當然我不是專業.<br>olympus可以打破傳統.讓user多一項新選擇也不錯<br>至少我現在就覺得我的400d太大了點<br>每次出去玩.和爬山都增加了重量和體積<br>若可以再輕量化.把dc的畫質提升到dslr.<br>很樂見其成.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiccer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2008 3:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[ross_tt兄講的超中肯<br><br>O記這樣搞根本就是我理想中的夢幻系統，等出了我一定把全套N家出清去換O記...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2008 10:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on éå¤§æ°èï¼Olympus å Panasonic ç¼è¡¨ Micro Four Thirds è¦æ ¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/08/05/olympus-panasonic-micro-four-thirds/</guid><description><![CDATA[我想，沒有五菱鏡結構，需要使用DC的對焦方式，會不會產生像DP-1那樣對焦慢且易迷焦的問題呢?那麼是否也該在機身設計上加入轉盤手動估焦的機構呢?O記在60/70年代的RF相機或許可以題供他們自己很好的參考吧?<br><br>而且，DSLR的菱鏡結構所能提供的清晰觀景窗與視野率，畢竟還是原來使用單反的朋友所在意的，所以真的要讓傳統SLR的結構消失在市場上，除非能真正提出一個在這方面使用上更舒服也更有效的解決方式，不然短期內恐怕是很難的！<br><br>不過我也很期待O記這款DSLC的量產，這正是我心中的夢幻街拍機呀！]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dizzyang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 5:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>