Skip to Content
看來我們對於相容性的看法的確不一樣 XD我想說明的是，以微軟之前的歷史來看，.Net Framework是一個分水嶺雖然有版本的差異，但沒辦法使用後面版本來執行前面版本的程式而微軟之前的慣例則是如果有版本上的差異的話，都會"試圖"用新版來取代掉舊版，並給予舊版程式(或文件)一定的相容性(如DirectX，但這件事也在Direct X 10時改變了)也就是說，你提的事正是我想表達的事微軟在前進時已把相容性丟在一旁，每踩出一步就代表一整個新的架構
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Tomky @ Aug 5th 2008 12:13PM
看來我們對於相容性的看法的確不一樣 XD
我想說明的是，以微軟之前的歷史來看，.Net Framework是一個分水嶺
雖然有版本的差異，但沒辦法使用後面版本來執行前面版本的程式
而微軟之前的慣例則是如果有版本上的差異的話，都會"試圖"用新版來取代掉舊版，並給予舊版程式(或文件)一定的相容性(如DirectX，但這件事也在Direct X 10時改變了)
也就是說，你提的事正是我想表達的事
微軟在前進時已把相容性丟在一旁，每踩出一步就代表一整個新的架構