<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[有硬體沒軟體支援也沒用阿 gpu在厲害也只是gpu而已]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2008 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[intel 吃鱉= =?<br>32nm tsmc趕得上intel?<br>我只能說tsmc不要先被以IBM為首的common platform 幹掉再說吧 ㄎㄎ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2008 10:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[技術就等於銷售嗎？<br>台機電在厲害，終究不會擺出來賣啊？<br>技術跟行銷是兩碼子是吧！]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N E L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2008 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[在PTT看到這篇文章，不知道真的假的。<br><a href="http://www.gamebase.com.tw/news/gb_news.html?sno=83462205" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamebase.com.tw/news/gb_news.html?sno=83462205</a><br><br>如果是真的，那除了這家公司外，其他的都不用混了......<br>真有這玩意的話，那可真是革命性的發展啊......<br>玩3D軟體就不用在整天等建模了XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[暗黑龍槍]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2008 11:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[就是一秒可以傳完一套A片，<br>也要電腦硬碟可以一秒抄錄完才行吧。<br>這個技術不論是真是假，<br>對我們草根階層來說還是遙遠的夢啊!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LamYipMing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 5:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[技術做的好不見的產品賣得好<br><br>多少台灣專利的技術無法發揚光大<br><br>多少奇怪的技術卻因為媒體曝光搞得好像世界第一?<br><br>技術上要幹掉intel不奇怪<br><br>產能幹掉intel才算真的利害]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[我覺得有點太樂觀了吧…<br><br>AMD和Nvidia的GPU不都是TSMC代工的嗎？<br>(ATI和Nvidia應該是fabless的吧？)<br><br>而TSMC製程想趕上Intel...應該有點難度...<br>想當初去年90nm->65nm時，<br>Intel在65nm製程引入High-K取代二氧化矽當閘極的絕緣層和使用metal gate時，<br>全世界只有Intel知道這個High-K材質<br>TSMC想破頭也想不出來…<br>結果是把難題留給下一代製程(45nm)<br>所以TSMC的65nm沒有改用High-K的絕緣層，<br>而是藉由東改改、西改改來達到spec要求...<br>(當初還聽TSMC的人說可能要等Intel CPU出來後，<br> 跟別的專門做逆向工程的公司買data...，<br> 不過就算知道材料，<br> 可能也需要2年的時間調校設備之類的才能上線)<br><br>而最近聽到的消息又不怎麼樂觀…<br>目前TSMC製程應該是55nm，<br>而原本下一代是45nm，改成直接跳到40nm，<br>本來預計今年底會上線，<br>不過先後延到明年1月和明年第一季末，<br>所以…應該又有地方卡住了...Orz<br><br>而製程這種東西感覺不是人在做的…<br>去年TSMC卡在High-K材料時(現在不知道解決了沒？)<br>65nm研發組(共有二、三十幾個Ph.D吧)每天從早上8點做到晚上11、12點...Orz<br><br>去年這些資訊是上課時從在TSMC工作的學長聽到的，<br>而最近的消息就純屬猜測。<br><br>總之，<br>TSMC加油吧！]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 5:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[不好意思<br>我好像記錯了<br>去年底是65nm->45nm<br>所以文中有關去年資訊的都差一代<br>65nm改成45nm<br>45nm改成32nm<br>因為是一年前上的課<br>所以細節有點忘記]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2008 3:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel在45nm才用high k+metal gate.<br>如果technology的強弱，用這種兩位數的比比看來比就可以，那這產業就完了。<br>T公司的重點是32nm要上hkmg。<br>不過Intel還是最強啦，不要相信網路上的無聊八卦<br>以後的半導體製造產業，是Intel 打其他所有人，他還是東方不敗啦，如果真的要檢討出他落後的可能的話，應該是他就算用了hkmg，atom耗電量還是比ARM大的多這是他最大的危機。<br>這種短聞，道不盡所有technology的故事啦，engadget還是別玩自己不熟悉的那一塊。這篇文章蠻誤導人的。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[summonee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[有技術才有銷售...個人是這麼以為的<br>縱然沒有好的商品還是可以靠銷售掩護幾次<br><br>消費者也許有點笨卻不是白癡<br>上過幾次當總會學乖的...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æå¹´ææ...Intelï¼ãè¦ï¼ç¬¬ä¸åä¸æ¯æï¼å­å­ï¼ã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/31/till-2009-intel-might-lose-its-edge-on-chip-manufacture/</guid><description><![CDATA[TSMC inside跟intel inside<br>似乎intel inside 比較吸引人]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ayumi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 2nd 2008 3:26AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>