http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for 龍鱗附著牆壁，翻雲覆雨！ http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/但實在太浪費能源啦
而且這麼多空壓缸同時運作應該挺吵的吧]]>Jul 4th 2008 10:34PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/沒想到建築業也有人在用哪]]>Jul 4th 2008 11:06PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://www.bix.at/ )結合肯定更帥！]]>Jul 4th 2008 11:18PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 12:02AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/而不是那些死氣 又醜又沒創意的建築...]]>Jul 5th 2008 12:14AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/只是除了炫跟很浪費能源外，這樣做不知還有沒有更深層的意義?
如果只有炫，那就僅是像魯夫說的~
哇~這是可以七段變形的機器人耶......
]]>Jul 5th 2008 12:23AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=ve0smppsyhA
這讓我想到去年的SONY live color wall project，在網站上點選了顏色，SONY銀座整棟大樓就會跟著變色。]]>Jul 5th 2008 12:37AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/然後設定跟著太陽角度轉，（像天文望遠鏡的追星儀功能）
這樣似乎可以在環保與建築美學之間達成平衡。

如果開車在路上被這種建築的反光閃到，
不曉得可不可以依據違反公共安全要求賠償。 ^_^!!
]]>Jul 5th 2008 12:46AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 1:21AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 1:24AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 1:28AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/各位就知道為什麼台灣建築都這麼爛的原因了吧!
國民素質差]]>Jul 5th 2008 3:53AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 8:42AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/有創意亮麗的外表並不能代表一切...]]>Jul 5th 2008 11:07AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/但是就設計理念而言,真的毫無實用性可言~
建築藝術當然也是有多樣性的,這就當做純藝術吧,但是真正的高深藝術應該能有讓人內省或哲學的理念隱含在內才好,也才對當代或後世有深遠的影響,也許這設計有,但是偶個人只看這骨牌效應的展示還感受不到~
還有藝術不是高級知識份子或者有品味的人才能了解才能創作的,藝術是生命,生命是藝術,沒有生命沒有藝術~]]>Jul 5th 2008 9:33AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/我有說浪費電是對的嗎?
有人真的知道他耗多少電嗎?
還搞不清楚用電量是多少
就說耗電
挾環保之名批評
就很高段
你自以為環保小勇士阿
我從創新的角度看
不代表我就不環保阿
]]>Jul 5th 2008 9:44AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/至少對方用詞無不當，你的用詞反而才有『嗆』的意味
2.重點不是在環保，而是各種不同的角度和意見，別人角度跟你不同就可以說別人『國民素質差』???
3.不滿別人的回應就使用挑釁的言詞，這就是所謂的『國民素質』嗎
]]>Jul 5th 2008 11:43AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/請參考教育部成語字典
http://dict.idioms.moe.edu.tw/chengyu/pho/fyu/fyu01089.htm]]>Jul 5th 2008 10:28AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/假如事事都要以環保或實用為取向, 那麼...

米開朗基羅的壁畫根本不會存在, 因為室內牆壁白白淨淨的才環保才節能啊!
所有的雕塑作品都應該被禁止, 因為完全是浪費原物料而無任何實用價值.
故宮那些薄到透光的瓷器根本是廢渣, 乘個熱湯會燙手, 稍微用力還會把它捏碎.
為什麼要有服飾業呢? 大家應該穿制服, 因為大量批次生產才省成本才節能啊!
旅遊業也該廢掉. 在家看Discovery或國家地理頻道就好了啊! 一樣可以增廣見聞而且省錢又環保呢!
既然我們已經知道攝取哪些東西可以維生, 那大家以後就服用綜合維他命加乾糧和開水過活吧! 什麼宮保雞丁紅燒獅子頭完全是沒必要的浪費.

藝術的發展有時就是建立在這種完全不實用的東西上面 (故宮裡面那些藝術品有幾件是真正實用取向的?), 至於這棟建築的藝術性如何, 那就是個人觀點的問題了.]]>Jul 5th 2008 10:38AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/07/04/flare-facade-cool-house/Jul 5th 2008 1:08PM