Skip to Content
我實在想不出這除了好玩之外，有甚麼實際需要；比一架真正的小型飛機或真正的汽車，它肯定不會省油，肯定不會快，不會好駕；更加不可能聽到電台說交通擠塞，就改為飛到目的地，說降落就降落即使在美國，的確有人駕小型飛機上班，也都是飛到機場換乘／駕汽車，怎也不會就把這駕到公路（除了好玩）怎樣說，也只是好玩吧？
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
lok cheung @ May 14th 2008 12:52PM
我實在想不出這除了好玩之外，有甚麼實際需要；比一架真正的小型飛機或真正的汽車，它肯定不會省油，肯定不會快，不會好駕；更加不可能聽到電台說交通擠塞，就改為飛到目的地，說降落就降落
即使在美國，的確有人駕小型飛機上班，也都是飛到機場換乘／駕汽車，怎也不會就把這駕到公路（除了好玩）
怎樣說，也只是好玩吧？