http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/ Engadget 癮科技 Comments for 水果商標之 iPod 外觀之哭吧! iPod 殺手! http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/
希望市面上所有假ipod全部消失

]]>May 14th 2008 2:51PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/:D]]>May 14th 2008 7:30PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/蘋果大股東？ 還是 Jobs 的徒子徒孫？

我只能說現行的法規
可能稍微保護了一些智財
但是也是阻礙人類進步的障礙]]>May 14th 2008 10:47PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/May 14th 2008 11:06PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/May 14th 2008 11:39PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/地表上可以少了一些抄襲的機器！
促進各家白牌mp3+mp4播放器的研發─
這才是應該做的事情；而不是抄襲，
然後繼續打著‘蘋果機’、〝愛趴〞替...賣產品...

如果用這種跟著人家光環走....那才叫做沒有進步！

另外；手上有APPL的股票可不可以發言啊？]]>May 14th 2008 11:17PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/地表上可以少了一些抄襲的機器！
促進各家白牌mp3+mp4播放器的研發─
這才是應該做的事情；而不是抄襲，
然後繼續打著‘蘋果機’、〝愛趴〞替...賣產品...

如果用這種跟著人家光環走....那才叫做沒有進步！

另外；手上有APPL的股票可不可以發言啊？]]>May 14th 2008 11:18PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/May 14th 2008 11:34PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/創造新的才是真的創意。
這跟阻礙人類進步毫無關係…
山寨已經不是模仿了，是黑心仿冒…]]>May 15th 2008 1:06AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/
套一段自由軟體基金會創辦人Richard Stallman 說的話：
「專利權本身的目的是為鼓勵人們將新創概念公佈出來，但現行的專利體系卻會造成反效果」他認為，專利文件雖然被公開，但事實上根本不會有人去讀，「因為沒有人是透過專利文件來學習新技術的，更不可能有人會願意去學習這些即使學到了卻會被禁止使用的技術」

當然，必須要有「利」才會有人肯創造
只是現行制度只是讓這些 Patent Troll 大行其利而已]]>May 15th 2008 2:10AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/設想如果你去整型得和劉德華一樣，然後跑去廣告公司，說劉德華的代言費太貴了，我只收一半的價錢。試問這樣可以嗎？
技術這種東西當然專利要有一定的年限，不然財富將集中少數人身上，就會阻礙進步。但是不管是外觀，或者是UI，成功的UI或迷人的外觀，都是開發者花了多少時間、金錢下去耕耘才有的結果，一些黑心廠商憑什麼不花半毛錢剽竊，就可以坐享其成？]]>May 15th 2008 3:23AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/那時也該有更好的新設計了吧，所以可以想見這個舊的造型會被塵封。
但由於永久保護，別的廠商 (即使願意) 依然無法採用相同的造型，
所以我們就跟這個設計永遠說再見。

創新？現在還有哪一項設計是「完全」不需要仰賴先人智慧的？

是以我認為保護還是要有限度的，即便真的讓他專賣個兩百年，也至少要有個「兩百年」的期限吧]]>May 15th 2008 4:05AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/講設計是好聽. 講難聽的, 一個長方形上面有著四邊形跟圓圈的物體都很有可能觸犯商標.

另外, 這不過就是五百大企業在玩的專利權蟑螂遊戲搞到商標上罷了. 興奮個什麼勁啊........-_-]]>May 15th 2008 7:21PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/May 17th 2008 12:25PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/05/14/apple-trademarks-ipods-design-applies-for-iphone-design-mark/May 23rd 2008 2:59AM