http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/ Engadget 癮科技 Comments for 可以多重觸控的 Eee PC 900 的處理器不是 Atom http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/Apr 15th 2008 9:07AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/Apr 15th 2008 9:20AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/Apr 15th 2008 9:34AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/
夠竟何時才可在澳門買呀....]]>Apr 15th 2008 9:56AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/觸控螢幕成本不是才15美元 轉嫁到消費者身上 長 五倍以上
900MHz Celeron M 價錢應該還剩下多少價值 大家都心知肚明吧
我懷疑 其中有巨大的利潤 不然為什麼這麼多廠商要搶著這塊市場]]>Apr 15th 2008 11:15AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/
如果看過被拆EEEPC，裡面CeleronM的批號都不是舊品，而是當年度生產的新品。
第二點，過去在PM時代販售給筆電廠的CPU裡，Celeron M並沒有900MHz這個料號。
第三點是道聽途說，據說這批900MHz沒有L2快取。

三點加起來可以猜測這是Intel為了滿足廠商低價的要求（不只ASUS用這顆去兜行動裝置）而產生「客製版」重新生產的料件。如果ASUS真的5/6月要出貨，那沿用CM應該跟Intel無關而是貪便宜。

站在atom新上市的立場，我不認為Intel會故意不推銷atom，而是賣舊架構是ASUS等廠商的下單條件]]>Apr 15th 2008 1:01PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/EPC使用者:(怨念四散)

cpu clocking至少要有1GHz吧?超孤寒的900MHz

L2也要1MB吧?這批900MHz好像有512KB的L2

也算吧,賣得這麼平也就是這樣的一回事..]]>Apr 15th 2008 1:32PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/
當傳媒應該對這一點留意比較好 (雖然香港現在的所謂「電腦雜誌」除了 PCM 外真的爛透了，直接宣傳盜版的也不少)

不過裡裡畢竟是癮科技不是PCM，就不說了。
====
如果這EeePC 最後還是用 Celeron，那就跟舊的沒分別啊 (用舊的就算不用某版本的 BIOS 超頻外用軟件也能輕易回到全速)]]>Apr 15th 2008 9:41PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/ 應該還是有差別

螢幕變大，有webcam

但是我還是想買HP的mininote

]]>Apr 16th 2008 12:53AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/
一而再、再而三推出失敗產品的中央處理器來欺騙社會大眾，華碩自從R2慘遭滑鐵盧以來，改頭換面、舊酒新裝，推出eeePC 701，硬碟則換成了SSD，當然與5400轉速的硬碟，當然是「快」了許多！

如今，不但不痛改前非，還執迷不悟，再次推出賽楊版的eeePC 900，真的想不通，到底英特爾給華碩多少好處了？

]]>Jun 6th 2008 6:50AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/15/video-eee-pc-900-processor-is-not-atom-multi-touch-trackpad-de/華碩不要把消費者看的笨，或許吃虧一次，BYE BYE 華碩，幾年後我預估風光不在>]]>Jun 6th 2008 7:41AM