Skip to Content
engadget對BENQ歧視很深+1
真的沒有啦！如果我不在意BenQ的話，選擇的方式是不理不睬，會寫的文章都代表該產品和消息都有報導的價值，BenQ的記者會我們甚至用3篇的篇幅報導，環顧台灣全部的媒體，有誰用到這樣的版面呢？不過我承認，我寫的文章就是主觀，但你可以盡量批評我，向上個讀者說我鏡頭沒比就亂說，我也覺得不好，所以會借T60回來比較，希望Allen能夠瞭解。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Allen @ Apr 12th 2008 11:30AM
engadget對BENQ歧視很深+1
atticus @ Apr 12th 2008 11:37AM
真的沒有啦！如果我不在意BenQ的話，選擇的方式是不理不睬，會寫的文章都代表該產品和消息都有報導的價值，BenQ的記者會我們甚至用3篇的篇幅報導，環顧台灣全部的媒體，有誰用到這樣的版面呢？
不過我承認，我寫的文章就是主觀，但你可以盡量批評我，向上個讀者說我鏡頭沒比就亂說，我也覺得不好，所以會借T60回來比較，希望Allen能夠瞭解。