<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget 癮科技 - Comments for LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link>
<description>Engadget 癮科技 Comments for LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[三鳥從VPX20就開始用TN了]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kotaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 6:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[所以標題應該改成 LCD costdown 儼然成形..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shollkee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[成本問題，還有一堆人看規格只會看尺寸跟反應時間，<br>還有價錢，TN唯一的優點就這些而已，沒了！<br>而且一般人也不太會真的去計較用啥面板，<br>你說我們科技宅們會計較，問題是對廠商來說，<br>那個九成不會算你TN不TN的，他就省，<br>喵的....TN真他媽的難看，畫面真的難看到誇張，<br>不過便宜還是給她買阿，如果廠商會調校的話，<br>可惜我看市面上一堆用TN的也沒啥在調校，那才叫糟糕！<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[呆宇]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[放心～高階永遠有市場，問題只在於口袋夠不夠深]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[我還在用CRT 感覺LCD畫面色彩是劣幣逐良幣<br><br>CRT為一的缺點就是<br><br>尺寸不夠大]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[illustrationart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[CRT 尺寸越大 屁股越長]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mesakey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2008 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[這哪是劣幣驅逐良幣<br>你要一個每天上網、打文書的小姐買 MVA的螢幕幹麼<br>TN就很好用了，難道他會一邊打word一邊跟你說<br>「恩～他x的，這個TN螢幕拿來看黑白的word檔超不飽和的」<br>偏偏電腦拿來作文書處理或者上網的，大概佔了大多數<br>拿來作美工或電動 需要高畫質的 比例上當然是少數<br>高品質面板當然不需要這麼多間廠商去作<br>而且TN一直在進步中，雖然差距還是有，但已經漸漸縮小了<br><br>這也就什麼產品有什麼人去買]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[牙膏]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2008 12:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[我是一個在做平面的設計師 <br>用TN的面板一樣可以做出很好的作品。<br>我們公司的室內設計 用n年前17吋的小螢幕<br>一樣可以做出讓客戶滿意的設計<br><br>除了給印刷廠印刷比較需要精準的顏色之外<br>(色光跟色料在這地球上是完全不一樣的東西 再這麼高級再怎麼調也不會一樣)<br>用那麼好的螢幕應該只是玩GAME 看電影心情比較爽吧~]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apleaplegirl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2008 1:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[能夠做出好的設計，不代表他的色偏就不見了<br><br>如果千元鈔因為校色錯誤而印出一兩噸的紫紅色鈔票才發現，這色偏問題可就大條了。<br>別告訴我政府從此把鈔票隨時改個顏色也可以...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[seisyuku]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2008 6:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[我比較算初級的閱讀者不太懂MVA、PVA、IPS面板或是TN面板係蝦米碗糕~~讓我來查查WILIPEDIA吧!!!或是~~有學識淵博的大大稍為指點一下也是不錯的選擇啦~~]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huang540526]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2008 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[嘖嘖嘖~~no~no~no~這你就不懂這行的專業暸~<br>沒有人會去相信螢幕上的顏色(螢幕顏色僅供參考)<br>我們在校色都是看色票和實際輸出來校色<br>要不然一本幾萬塊比螢幕還貴的pantone色票是賣假的咩!?<br>我再解釋一次~<br>色光跟色料在這地球上是完全不一樣的東西 <br>再這麼高級的螢幕再怎麼調也不會一樣]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apleaplegirl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2008 10:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LCDä½å¹é¢¨æ½®å¼ç¶æå½¢ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2008/04/04/lcd-low-eng-trend/</guid><description><![CDATA[apple螢幕用的面板也是頂級的吧?<br>有人知道嗎?<br>與EIZO作比較，優缺點是什麼呢?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[超]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2008 4:15AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>