Skip to Content
如果是在開放(曝氣)的環境下醱酵，則會產生較多的CO2，但是開放環境無法儲壓，所以想利用壓差來發電應該不太可行。再加上以代謝能量的觀點來看，曝氣醱酵比較容易把糖變成ATP，故能量大部分都被消耗掉了，醱酵成酒精，則有較多能量儲存下來，故以CO2來發電的想法應該就更不可行。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
肥狸貓 @ Dec 9th 2007 5:29AM
如果是在開放(曝氣)的環境下醱酵，則會產生較多的CO2，但是開放環境無法儲壓，所以想利用壓差來發電應該不太可行。再加上以代謝能量的觀點來看，曝氣醱酵比較容易把糖變成ATP，故能量大部分都被消耗掉了，醱酵成酒精，則有較多能量儲存下來，故以CO2來發電的想法應該就更不可行。