http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for 磁浮風力渦輪機比一般風力發電機有效率 1000 倍 http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/基本上我個人對這個消息持懷疑的態度. 信心指數低於1%]]>Nov 28th 2007 2:11AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/Nov 28th 2007 2:33AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/Nov 28th 2007 2:41AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/發電的效率是傳統風力發電機的 1333 倍, 而使用的地面
空間只要傳統風力發電機的 500 分之 1.

廠商宣稱是因為使用 "永久磁鐵" 的 "磁浮技術", 讓機組
的摩擦損失降到最低，所以可以 ...xxxooo...

如果有這樣的技術，拿來做磁浮列車我想會更合適．不必
用電就可以讓車浮起來哩，而且永久有效...


]]>Nov 28th 2007 2:57AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/
即是相等放發明了「永動機」吧…]]>Nov 28th 2007 3:08AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/磁浮電車你用一般磁鐵也是可以浮起來啊，只是不會往前跑而以。

不過我還是對聲稱的如此高效率發電懷疑～]]>Nov 28th 2007 3:18AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/
那就是說別的風力發電效率不能超過0.1%，不然1000倍下來，這款外星球發明的風力發電機的效率超過1000%？

(我記得風力發電的效率比太陽能板高一點，也就是應高於15%)

沒時間細看英文版的回應，不知這個矛盾何解？
]]>Nov 28th 2007 3:39AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/Nov 28th 2007 5:59AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/]]>Dec 4th 2007 6:54AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/Nov 28th 2007 9:00AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/低溫所要耗用的電比發出來的電要多吧. (不管風大風小,
都要浮的起來... 而且風愈小愈是需要浮的徹底...)]]>Nov 28th 2007 9:34AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/垂直式跟傳統扇葉式風力發電機其實發電效率是一樣的,因為根本就是一樣的原理,只是一台是電風扇,一台是大廈扇,但為什麼可以一台抵1000台?因為垂直轉軸式結構上就強得多,葉片可以做很大很多,再降到最低磨擦力的前題下,當然可以輕輕的微風就能推動相等負載,前面有說可能對鳥禽類有很大殺傷力,我覺得應該不用擔心啦,一般情況轉速可能不超過5rpm,要在上面築巢都沒問題
以上個人意見,請指教]]>Nov 28th 2007 10:13AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/問題在把系統放大到這麼大的話，會造成的問題頗多....
光是沒風的時候怎麼保持磁浮就是個大問題了><

不過也因為是垂直軸式發電機，才有這幾個優勢跟特色
傳統水平發電機的葉扇跟面積比.......很浪費空間.....]]>Nov 28th 2007 10:16AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/這麼說來，
那些散熱扇磁浮不也就能用來一邊發電一邊散熱嚕～]]>Nov 28th 2007 10:30AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/就理論上可以! 會動就有能量
問題在於消耗跟效益?]]>Nov 28th 2007 1:55PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/Oct 28th 2008 8:53PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/大家都覺得1000倍有點誇張，
小弟我覺得只要100倍甚至比以往進步，
那就是人類前進的一步了~
很棒的發明喔！希望小癮未來能多報相關的事物^^~]]>Nov 28th 2007 11:35PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/
結果發現問題出在中文翻譯有誤，編輯下的標題離英文原意太遠了。

英文版是說一座磁浮風力渦輪機的發電量約等於1000座傳統風力渦輪機。若真的要論效率，英文內文的確也提到，約提高了50%效率，也就是0.5倍，說1000倍太沈重了。
]]>Nov 29th 2007 4:27AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/但就怕激起大家辯論,反而成了他們反宣傳的手法.

廠商宣稱是因為使用 "永久磁鐵" 的 "磁浮技術", 讓機組的摩擦損失降到最低，所以可以 ...

真是欺騙三歲小孩子!]]>Nov 29th 2007 11:17AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/28/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/這個概念上是行得通的啊]]>Nov 29th 2007 5:43PM