<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for </title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[凳子搬來，準備好零食了。<br>什麼時候好戲上場呢？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[暗黑龍槍]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTune + iPod 很正常吧...<br>難道要人家 LV 賣個 Gucci 的手袋給你?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hkmario]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 7:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTune + iPod 當然不正常...<br>難道使用者買LV旅行箱, 裡面卻不准放Gucci的東西?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[二樓類比不對，又不是說叫Apple賣Zune。舉例應該類似...用Benz的鑰匙圈就不能開BMW的車一樣。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shouea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[如果LV賣香水給你, 但規定你一定也只能把它放在LV的提袋裡不然不能用, 如何?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kakaya]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[ iTune + iPod 正不正常不知道<br>不過應該是說使用者買LV旅行箱, 一起買的特價商品, 卻不准放進Gucci的包包裡用]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alufa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[五樓中肯]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[這樣的投訴絕對不是第一次了，好幾年前就一直有類似的投訴。<br><br>我也不覺得這和微軟的壟斷有多大分別。說難聽一點，至少大部份情況下，微軟還是能讓你自己安裝自己想要的 software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrianshum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[有差嗎?<br>反正還不是用的很爽-.-]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[不知道是不是惡意(或許apple 覺得其他的軟體都太濫了, 所以出自於好意.. 強迫大家用itune)<br>但肯定是壟斷<br><br>反正就是一個願打(apple)一個願挨(users)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[axing01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 10:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[沒有人願挨的<br>只是被逼挨打<br>否則有ipod也無用]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OverMAX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 10:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[也有人認為iTunes的音樂管理以及iPod同步<br>才是iPod的精華所在 (有點難理解就是了XD)<br>正所謂一念天堂，一念地獄]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaaklo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2007 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[那有一個問題：既然知道iTS的音樂只能在iPod上面播放，那幹麻還上去iTS買?<br><br>市面上可以買音樂的途徑一堆，並不是iTS獨占市場不是?<br><br>白話的說法：沒人逼你去iTS買東西啊!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[easonking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 12:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[AAC PSP就可以放啊]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max20]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[我記得wmp11 也可以同步]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[axing01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[老兄,<br>平台問題是告不了誰的]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OverMAX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 5:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[這篇重點跟標題有點不符...<br>基本上他是在告DRM這玩意兒<br><br>夾不死：音樂又不是我想鎖DRM~是唱片公司老闆大頭症發作不關我的事啊～<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[魔法岩男]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 6:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[還好我都沒有..壟斷不壟斷乾我屁事]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[帥哥]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2007 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/11/08/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/</guid><description><![CDATA[那AutoCAD只出Windows版的我也可以告它壟斷嗎？還是這要告微軟？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[光]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2007 11:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>