<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[上市前，發明者應該會被sony等電池大廠的人追殺吧 XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XAVIER24]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[如果筆電的電池有500g，那72倍就是36公斤了，帶這麼重的電池是要練身體用的是吧?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keyesliu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 6:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[真做出來也無法上市<br>賣一次喝西北風30年]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rose_roo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[30年應該是個估計最大，一般筆電汰換壽命也不見得有這麼長。加上30年期間，搞不好又出現300年壽命電池=.=<br><br>所以我認為雖然可以搞到30年，不過可以降低成本、生產污染，減低重量、體積等等，大概個壽命5年、10年的，就超過一般筆電使用壽命了。相信價錢也會比較親民些。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[afun9999]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 6:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[直覺是軍用品 或是太空 深海 極地等特別的地方用的]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[秋]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 30å¹´çé·æé»æ± æå¥½å¤¢æçåï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/10/04/30-year-battery-may-be-too-good-to-be-true/</guid><description><![CDATA[似乎有點誤解，原文的意思應該是 Goodwins 列舉幾項疑慮：1)原子結構恐因高能電子撞擊而被破壞；2)原本 "無公害" 的電池，一旦外殼破裂仍可能造成汙染；3)能源轉換效率僅25% (代表75% 的能量轉為熱能)；以及 4) 重量大約是現有產品的72倍重。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[morning.liang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 11:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>