<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for ç¾æé«æ³é¢å°å©å¤æ±ºç¢çå½±é¿ï¼å°å©æªå®¢éæ£ï¼</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/08/03/judges-fighting-litigation-with-supreme-courts-obvious-patent/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for ç¾æé«æ³é¢å°å©å¤æ±ºç¢çå½±é¿ï¼å°å©æªå®¢éæ£ï¼</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ç¾æé«æ³é¢å°å©å¤æ±ºç¢çå½±é¿ï¼å°å©æªå®¢éæ£ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/08/03/judges-fighting-litigation-with-supreme-courts-obvious-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/08/03/judges-fighting-litigation-with-supreme-courts-obvious-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[總算有法官眼睛雪亮內心清明地看到有許多專利根本就是所謂“一堆基本常識拼湊而成的基本做法“，包羅在這樣概念的商品，被先登記該概念專利的專利怪客索賠的訟案，將會依此判例無法再輕易得到勝利。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JOINGO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2007 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ç¾æé«æ³é¢å°å©å¤æ±ºç¢çå½±é¿ï¼å°å©æªå®¢éæ£ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/08/03/judges-fighting-litigation-with-supreme-courts-obvious-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/08/03/judges-fighting-litigation-with-supreme-courts-obvious-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[想請問圖中文字："Obviously you're wrong"，配合著底下一群法官們，是代表著什麼隱喻嗎？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gydw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2007 10:47PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>