Skip to Content
果然又是丁丁新聞一則，前面網友指正的就不重複RHEL4 ? 有沒有搞錯？那是2005 的東西，RHEL5 都出來了。這樣制造的"公正評估"?原文http://blogs.csoonline.com/node/218這根本就是公關新聞。請去看原文跟http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/22/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/就會看到被一堆人罵到爆
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
shelandy @ Jun 23rd 2007 12:25PM
果然又是丁丁新聞一則，前面網友指正的就不重複
RHEL4 ? 有沒有搞錯？那是2005 的東西，RHEL5 都出來了。這樣制造的"公正評估"?
原文http://blogs.csoonline.com/node/218這根本就是公關新聞。請去看原文跟http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/22/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/
就會看到被一堆人罵到爆