<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[但我還是停留在XP…<br><br>我不喜歡開個檔案還要確認個幾次…]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin68x]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[本來 MS 的產品就不是 open source 的<br>基本上屬於黑盒子系統<br><br>一般 open source 的產品, 因為 source 的公開, 其實稍微<br>去 trace 一下 code , 大概就知道那些地方會有安全性的問題<br>例如: buffer  overflow , 或是一些安全機制檢查的問題<br><br>或許有人會說, open source 好像很危險 ? 打開大門讓大家<br>可以大辣辣的免費進來參觀, 但是由於可以打開大門 <br>所以有不少好心的 "遊客" 可以提供一些建議與修改 <br>讓房子更加牢固  ... (但是也是有可能有人提供爛意見)<br><br>反觀 MS 的黑盒子, 當問題發生的時候, 基本上已經是很嚴<br>重了, 因為大部分的 Cracker 早已經利用該漏洞做了 許多<br>勾當 .. 使用者只能期望那一天有一個官方 patch 可以修補<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[果然...VISTA虛到連駭客都懶的駭了]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[generationk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 1:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[這份報告中的Linux項目是full installaton<br>也就是安裝了很多不須要的Server套件<br>反觀Vista和XP都是Desktop OS<br>這根本是做出的報告]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Tang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 3:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[微軟漏洞不多，但都比人家大洞]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[domos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[果然又是丁丁新聞一則，前面網友指正的就不重複<br>RHEL4 ?  有沒有搞錯？那是2005 的東西，RHEL5 都出來了。這樣制造的"公正評估"?<br>原文<a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/node/218這根本就是公關新聞。請去看原文跟http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/22/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.csoonline.com/node/218這根本就是公關新聞。請去看原文跟http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/22/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</a><br>就會看到被一堆人罵到爆]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shelandy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å ±åï¼Vista æ¯ OS X å Linux é½å®å¨]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/06/23/report-vista-more-secure-than-os-x-and-linux/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://antimstw.blogspot.com/2007/06/windows-vista.html" rel="nofollow">http://antimstw.blogspot.com/2007/06/windows-vista.html</a><br>不就是不實廣告嘛，反正廣告也沒什麼公信力]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EuxineTL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2007 2:58PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>