http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/ Engadget 中文版 Comments for 還是告了，思科控告蘋果侵犯商標 http://chinese.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://chinese.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/or G-phone.
you-phone.
or U-phone.
I&I-PHONE.
or II-PHONE .]]>Jan 11th 2007 8:29PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/這樣忤逆　賈伯斯， Cisco 這間公司最後一定會不得好死。]]>Jan 11th 2007 12:21PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/
Did they already get any TM that started by i?

iSuck, iJunk......]]>Jan 11th 2007 7:37AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/簽下由 Cisco 準備好的授權和約．

純就官司來論，反正 iPhone 也沒上市，不想簽思科的合約的
話，自然會有 Apple 的法務人員來研究官司會勝訴還是敗訴．
有把握的話就硬上，沒把握的話大不了改名叫 Apple Phone，
也不會有什麼損失．

Cisco/Linksys 真的擁有 iPhone 這個名字嗎? 我很懷疑．
畢竟早在 1995 年就有名叫 iPhone 的商品了 (VocalTek
推出的，類似 Skype 的軟體)
]]>Jan 11th 2007 6:32AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 6:13AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/背面也只有電鍍的"缺角蘋果"而已....
愛怎麼叫它都可以~~~!!!
]]>Jan 11th 2007 6:10AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/
Cisco有何需要要打這種廣告? 反而是Apple, 利用Macworld獲得高曝光率, 炒熱股價上漲, 利用iPhone名號博得新聞版面, 明顯的廣告需求絕對比Cisco大太多了.

而且Cisco產品以企業為主, 消費性電子產品比重有限, 論廣告效果重要性來看, Apple有更多理由用iPhone去搶新聞版面.

錯的事情就是錯了, 不會因為他是Apple就變成對的.]]>Jan 11th 2007 5:42AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/而且apple所有的都"i"字行頭，連steve在keynote時也讀錯了數次Apple TV做iTV
在很多人心目中 "i" 字頭已變成了屬於apple的了]]>Jan 11th 2007 5:22AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 5:12AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 4:58AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/
]]>Jan 11th 2007 4:19AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 3:34AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 4:07AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Jan 11th 2007 3:31AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/將 iPhone 這個註冊商標給搞沒了． 有興趣的人可以去瞧瞧：
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/13/cisco-might-have-lost-iphone-trademark-in-06/

內容大意是說：如果你註冊了一個商標，你必須去使用他．而
思科取得的這個商標在 11/16/2005 止，已經連續六年沒拿來
用過了～　所以，這個商標權會被作廢．不過有六個月寬限期
．． 把六個月加起來就是 05/16/2006 囉～ 五月? 我記得去
年五月 Cisco 還沒發表他們的 Voip iPhone 吧!

難怪蘋果老神在在... 這一回合看來 Cisco 要贏有點吃力囉~]]>Jan 14th 2007 2:44AMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/侵權就是侵權,如果太過無賴,會造成消費者的反感的!]]>Jan 13th 2007 12:39PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/
事實上, 這根本是Apple剛好賺到, 只能說運氣真好, 因為在爭議出現之初, Apple的理由是他們是手機產業第一個叫iPhone的, 所以認為他們可以用iPhone這個名稱, 根本不是Cisco可能失去iPhone商標這個原因, 因此Apple一開始就是篤定要搶來用, 只是現在被人挖出來這一點, 為Apple的立場補強了一點, 實際上...Apple一開始也沒料到有這招吧! 只能說, Apple這種行為很不可取, 不過看在Apple打官司常常吃悶虧 (圖形化介面之爭...台灣仿冒shuffle之爭), Apple應該可以happy一下.]]>Feb 8th 2007 12:50PMhttp://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/http://chinese.engadget.com/2007/01/11/cisco-sues-apple-for-trademark-infringement-ruh-roh/Feb 14th 2007 8:16PM