<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget 癮科技 - Comments for Intel Penryn Core 2 Quad èçå¨å°ãå¦ææ¨åºã</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</link>
<description>Engadget 癮科技 Comments for Intel Penryn Core 2 Quad èçå¨å°ãå¦ææ¨åºã</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Penryn Core 2 Quad èçå¨å°ãå¦ææ¨åºã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</guid><description><![CDATA[CPU 越來越省電<br />CPU 卻都快要只用額外的外接電源<br />把CPU省下來的都浪費回去了]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[etlove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 1st 2006 5:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Penryn Core 2 Quad èçå¨å°ãå¦ææ¨åºã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</guid><description><![CDATA[研發出來<br />不代表能量產<br />量產出來<br />不代表良率高<br />]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kinoi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 2nd 2006 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Penryn Core 2 Quad èçå¨å°ãå¦ææ¨åºã]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/12/01/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/</guid><description><![CDATA[以 Intel 來說 應該不會太差吧 畢竟是全世界最厲害的半導體廠了<br />T ＆ U 還在比 65nm 的時候 他的CPU 65nm 早就已經賣了好久了<br />製程程度 差異是不少 ～ 算算應該也差不多了]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wujerSquid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 2nd 2006 5:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>