<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; - Comments for æ¸ä½æä»£éé±ï¼åå¸ WIFLY ä¸å¤§ç¼ºå¤±ãä¸å¤§è¿·æï¼ä¸ï¼</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/27/wifly-good-or-not-in-taipei-3/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; Comments for æ¸ä½æä»£éé±ï¼åå¸ WIFLY ä¸å¤§ç¼ºå¤±ãä¸å¤§è¿·æï¼ä¸ï¼</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on æ¸ä½æä»£éé±ï¼åå¸ WIFLY ä¸å¤§ç¼ºå¤±ãä¸å¤§è¿·æï¼ä¸ï¼]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/27/wifly-good-or-not-in-taipei-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/27/wifly-good-or-not-in-taipei-3/</guid><description><![CDATA[「號稱八Ｍ、二Ｍ的ＡＤＳＬ固網寬頻服務，其實用戶端最常使用的速度僅三百多Ｋ，WIFLY的五一二Ｋ相對之下頻寬夠大」<br />這個三百多K是 300+ bytes/s<br />512K 是 512 bit/s = 64 bytes/s<br />這兩個差了五倍多，怎麼會相對之下夠大？<br />而且 512K 實際速度也不會真的是 512K<br />所以兩者差距基本上就是 8M=8000K 比 512K<br />也就是速度是差了 16 倍<br />說無線網路便宜絕對也不便宜啦，方便倒是真的很方便]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lamour]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2006 9:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>