<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget 癮科技 - Comments for å¯å£«é Fujitsu æ¨åº P1610 å¹³æ¿é»è¦</title>
<link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/23/fujitsu-p1610-tablet-pc-announce/</link>
<description>Engadget 癮科技 Comments for å¯å£«é Fujitsu æ¨åº P1610 å¹³æ¿é»è¦</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å¯å£«é Fujitsu æ¨åº P1610 å¹³æ¿é»è¦]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/23/fujitsu-p1610-tablet-pc-announce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/23/fujitsu-p1610-tablet-pc-announce/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am a UMPC user now(just show in my blog http://vlinkup.blogspot.com/), in fact i won't run web server or photoshop on my UMPC, so if only compare the CPU, i think it is meaningless, just like still asking more pixel in DC camera. <br /><br />But i am very agree with the resolution of the UMPC is very crucial, and anticipating the improvement in such aspect on UMPC.<br /><br />]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2006 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on å¯å£«é Fujitsu æ¨åº P1610 å¹³æ¿é»è¦]]></title><link>http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/23/fujitsu-p1610-tablet-pc-announce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://chinese.engadget.com/2006/11/23/fujitsu-p1610-tablet-pc-announce/</guid><description><![CDATA[影片沒辦法看囉]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[omero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2006 11:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>